Is it really fair to blame one man for destroying the US economy?Probably not. But Alan Greenspan is still tops on our list. After all, Greenspan "presided over the greatest expansion of speculative finance in history, including a trillion-dollar hedge fund industry, bloated Wall Street-firm balance sheets approaching $2 trillion, and a global derivatives market with notional values surpassing an unfathomable $220 trillion." (Henry Liu, "Why the Subprime Bust will Spread" Asia Times) Greenspan is also responsible for slashing the real Fed Funds Rate so that it was negative for 31 months from 2002 to 2005. That decision flooded the housing market with trillions of dollars in low interest credit creating the largest equity bubble in history. Now that that bubble is crashing; Greenspan has hit the road. He now spends his time leap-frogging from city to city hawking his revisionist memoirs of how he steered the ship of state through troubled waters while fending off protectionist liberals. Look for it in the Fiction section of your local bookstore.
Still, can we really blame "Maestro" for what appears to have been a spontaneous flurry of "free market" speculation in real estate?
To a large extent, yes. Apart from Greenspan's tacit endorsement of all the dubious loans (subprime, ARMs etc) which flourished during his reign; and despite his brusque rejection of the Fed's role as regulator; the Federal Reserve's own documents ("House Prices and Monetary Policy: A Cross-Country Study") indicate that housing was "specifically targeted" acknowledging that it would serve as "a key channel of monetary policy transmission". This is not even particularly controversial any more. In fact, we can see that this same scam has been used in England, Spain and Ireland---all now suffering the ill-effects of massive real estate inflation. Low interest rates continue to be the most efficient way of stealthily shifting wealth from one class to another while decimating the foundations of a healthy economy.